Back to the
library Next article Previous article
By Phoenix& -- ^Thane, ^Raven, and ^Max, 9.02
Psychology and Mental Health
In Psychology and Mental Health, Multiple Personality (note the
lack of 'disorder') is lumped together with Amnesia and Fugue. Useful
enough is the glossary of terms at the top of the page, just under the
header, which states;
This chapter, in fact, is generally more correct about the clinical
views of multiplicity than any of the full books on the subject. Summarized,
what the chapter says is as follows;
It then discusses, in detail, amnesia and fugue. Fugue will be defined
here, as a basis of comparison for a bit of nonsense when 'All in the
Mind' is discussed;
The following section is on 'Multiple Personality'. Summarized, with
comments inserted:
This statement is entirely untrue - it is commonly reported in multiple
systems that people will co-run consciousness for great lengths of time,
working together to think and 'run' the body. The book obviously is consulting
dated and 'well-documented' cases, probably from psychologist's notes.
Also untrue. Shifts may be subtle, and quiet. In fact most healthy multiple
systems will switch without any fanfare besides a simple announcement
of who is about to front and then a few moments of quiet as the transition
is made. Usually 'abrupt and dramatic' shifts are reserved for those who
aren't co-operating well enough amongst themselves to divide time in a
reasonable way.
Most individuals with multiple personality disorder have one primary
personality, as well as one or more secondary personalities. The primary
personality is the individual who is known to most people. This personality
is often quiet, meek, and obedient, while the secondary personalities
tend to be more aggressive, irresponsible, and pleasure seeking.'
This paragraph is riddled with parts that can logically be contested.
Many systems do not have a single 'primary personality', but rather have
several people who 'front', or interact with the world. These 'fronts'
can be anything, not just 'quiet meek and obedient' - this misconception
probably stems from the 'multiple' cases who developed other personalities
simply to please their psychologists. 'Secondary' personalities implies
that these are somehow the 'lesser' or 'created' people. Indeed, these
people may be any range of aggressive to meek, but simply do not do front
work, for one reason or another. This does not make them any lesser than
people who 'front'. Often the reason is simply to maintain a balanced
look to the outer world, or because they co-consciously run things with
another person in the system.
This explanation does seem to make a bit of sense. However, there are
many systems who report no cases of 'extreme' abuse, and with current
parenting situations turning for the worse - more and more cases of multiplicity
due to these poor circumstances should be turning up. Instead, this remains
a rare diagnosis. Some multiple systems, as demonstrated by many websites,
groups, and personal e-mails, may have a history of abuse, but few of
them will link this as the source of their multiplicity. You may find
links to these pages in the bibliography.
Psychology and Mental Health then goes on to discuss the treatment
and therapy for the three dissociate disorders. A documented case of fugue
and it's treatment is discussed. It then goes on to discuss Eve White,
considered a precedent for many multiple cases, as she is one of the first
well documented cases with no evident pressure from the psychiatrists
treating her.
...She was seized by a sudden headache and put both hands to her head.
[Thigpen and Cleckley] report that "after a tense moment of silence,
her hands dropped. There was a quick, reckless smile and, in a bright
voice that sparkled she said, "Hi there, Doc!"' The patient began to
talk about Eve White in a casual and carefree manner; she referred to
Eve White as "her" and "she." When asked her name, the patient stated
"Oh, I'm Eve Black."
...The therapist began to discover that Eve Black was "a party girl,
shrewd, childishly vain, and egocentric." While Eve White was suffering
from blackouts, Eve Black would attend parties, flirt with men in bars,
and engage in while spending sprees. Eve Black would then retreat and
force Eve White to deal with the consequences... Eve white had no awareness
of Eve Black. Eve Black was, however, typically conscious of Eve White
and her troubles. Eve Black was also able to remember a number of painful
childhood memories that Eve White was completely unable to recall. ...As
treatment progressed it, it was Eve Black who was able to tell the therapist
how Eve White was severely beaten by her parents as a child.
Eventually a third personality emerged from this young woman. This
personality, named Jane, was aware of both Eve White and Eve Black.
Jane was described as more mature, thoughtful, and balanced than either
Eve White or Eve Black. The emergence of Jane may thus have represented
an attempt on the part of this patient to integrate aspects of Eve White
and Eve Black into one cohesive personality.
...Thigpen and Cleckly eventually published a popular account of them
in a book entitled The Three Faces of Eve. Eve's case history serves
as a clear example of how an individual can develop multiple personalities,
each of which can take a life of it's own.'
‘Eve’, actually Chris Sizemore, then went on to publish her own works
on the matter, I'm Eve, due to dissatisfaction with her portrayal,
and the poor understanding the therapists had on her situation. The original
work, The Three Faces of Eve is a popular success, as it portrays a cut-and-dried
multiple system, with an easily defined answer at the end. Also, the system
went on to integrate - the popularly held 'cure' for multiplicity, which
involves the 'unification' of the personalities, or the elimination or
incorporation of all persons but one. In fact, very few cases of multiplicity
are this simple.
The 'childhood abuse' model easily defines this system - Eve White being
the 'original' personality, who developed another person to take on the
abuse of her parents - 'Eve Black'. This model does /not/ explain the
multiple systems with as many people as 80 or 100. Why would one need
to create more than one 'other' person simply to handle abuse, when one
would serve just as well? The third person in the system , Jane, served
as the path for integration. She was the person who 'incorporated' both
Eve White and Eve black into one 'cohesive personality'. Many multiple
systems have no need for such a member, operating well enough without
integrating at all.
Last, the book discusses 'Perspective and prospects', with little relevant
information, summed up below:
...These disorders are actually quite rare. ...Because of the extreme
rarity of these condtions, the dissociative disorders are not a major
mental health problem in the United States.
Many social scientists, ...believe that these disorders merit further
study. ...Expressions suggest dissociative reactions are commonly used
to describe individuals. One might say that someone is "running away
from his problems," is "not quite herself today" or "has become a different
person". ...Multiple personality may thus be nothing more than a very
extreme and dramatic exaggeration of a common human experience.'
The last part is definitely interesting enough. It seems logical that
multiplicity is nothing more than an extreme case of a natural human mind-state.
Especially with the emergence of more and more healthy multiples. Dramatic
it may or may not be, depending on the case in state. 'Psychology and
Mental Health' does not discuss any other cases than Eve, and therefore
is sorely lacking in any viewpoints that may oppose the childhood abuse
model.
Bibliography
|